CVNA’s GAAP Illusion: Where the Losses Really Are
5,000 Repos, Zero Charge-Offs: The Carvana ABS Accounting Gap
Important Note: ABS Data Analysis overlayed with Financial Report Models is available only for our institutional clients. To become our client, email laks@unicusresearch.com.
CVNA’s Hidden Risk Is Already Repossessed. Just Not Recognized (Yet)
While Carvana’s Q1 earnings paint a picture of strength, the company’s ABS loan pools tell a very different story.
In CVNA 2025-P2 alone, over 5,000 loans are likely to have been repossessed, a repo rate of 20.2%, far above subprime norms. Every loan has been extended at least once, and most borrowers are in deep subprime FICO ranges.
Yet, Carvana reported a $3 million gain on these same securitizations.
This isn’t a glitch, it’s the structured finance playbook. Losses are accumulating within the trust but have not yet been reflected in the company’s GAAP income statement. We are triangulating the data to estimate the cushion left in each trust (this is for clients only).
In this free report, we map how trust-level deterioration becomes financial headline risk and why watching ABS data first gives you an edge over the market.
This is just a sample. Effective July 2025, detailed analysis will be available only for founding members. The prices go up, and the best time to upgrade at a discounted rate is now.
Trust-Level Reality (Data from CVNA 2025-P2)
Repo Rate: 20.2% of 25,838 loans → ~5,221 repossessions (but the repos. are not in absolute terms, they are in aggregate terms - see in the upcoming analysis).
Extension Rate: 100% — every loan has been modified or extended at least once
FICO Profile: Many loans in the 570–700 range (deep subprime to fringe prime)
Vintage Repossession Leader: 2024 cohort at 22.9% repo rate
This level of repo activity exceeds subprime norms (~8–12%) and points to severe embedded stress in CVNA’s off-balance-sheet loan books.
What CVNA’s 10-Q Shows (GAAP Accounting View)
From Q1 2025 filings:
CVNA is not recognizing the trust-level distress as actual charge-offs or impairments, meaning the losses are not hitting the income statement yet.
Key Red Flags and Implications
Timing Gap
Trusts are absorbing repos now, but GAAP charges are delayed via:
Loan extensions
Residual valuation assumptions
Accounting treatment of retained interests
Cushion Modeling
Credit enhancements (reserves + excess spread) might still be absorbing early losses.
But 20%+ repo volume is aggressive.
If residuals get written down or credit enhancement burns off — losses will re-enter GAAP.
Triggers to Watch
Bottom Line
CVNA is exhibiting a textbook case of off-balance-sheet stress being deferred, not absorbed, by its financial statements.
The balance sheet doesn’t lie, it just takes its time.
CVNA is not alone. We are tracking other lenders and they are the same, if not, worse.
The Unrealized Gain Paradox
This reflects non-cash mark-to-market adjustments CVNA applies to retained interests (excess spread) in ABS trusts.
When CVNA reports a $3M gain, it means they believe their future share of cash flows from the trust became more valuable.
Why is this suspicious?
Repo rate in CVNA 2025-P2 = 20.2% (~5,221 repos)
Cash flows to residual holders are likely declining, not rising
Marking up a deteriorating trust interest implies a delay or distortion in internal economic assumptions.
Implication:
If trust cash flows disappoint, CVNA will need to write down residual values in future quarters
This will hit the income statements after the actual deterioration occurred.
How Loss Recognition is Deferred
Off-Balance Sheet Structure
ABS trusts are legally separate
Repos within trusts do not affect CVNA’s P&L directly
Residual Mark-to-Market Delay
Residual impairment depends on internal models.
If models are not updated timely manner, losses remain hidden.
Servicing Fee Insulation
CVNA still earns fees for managing the trust
These income streams are untouched by repo spikes (unless triggers are breached)
Charge-Off Accounting Rules
GAAP charge-offs happen only if:
CVNA holds the loan on-book
The residual interest is impaired.
A guarantee or support structure kicks in.
Sample Visual Timeline (Coming in Full Report)
Nov 2024: Loan enters delinquency
Dec 2024: Extension applied to stall charge-off
Jan 2025: Repossession logged in ABS
Feb 2025: Trust-level charge-off
Mar 2025: GAAP income statement may reflect impact (if at all)
approximation.
Final Thoughts
You’re now seeing the full deterioration cycle, starting in the ABS data and slowly creeping toward GAAP. This is where equity risk truly begins.
Want to see these patterns across ALLY, KMX, CVNA, and others, month by month?
Become a paid founding subscriber for the whole data feed, repo dashboards, and trust-level timeline visualizations.
Assuming I'm looking at the same 2025-P2 loan data that you are, which header/category are you referencing that implies 100% modificiation? Is it the "reportingPeriodModificationIndicator"? Not all loan is true in that category. Additionally, which category is the repo?